Rosebank and Jackdaw fields: Billions at stake in court battle over North Sea oil and gas

Published On Nov 15, 2024, 6:03 PM

Environmental campaigners are challenging the UK government's approval of the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields, claiming that these approvals were unlawful due to insufficient environmental impact assessments. The court case highlights concerns about the environmental implications of exploiting these resources, especially in light of a recent Supreme Court ruling that requires assessments to include downstream emissions. The ruling could affect investments in these projects, particularly for companies like Equinor and Shell, which have made significant financial commitments to these fields. The outcome of the court's decision could reshape government energy policies and impact the oil and gas industry's future in the UK.

Stock Forecasts

The ongoing legal challenges to Rosebank and Jackdaw's approval could lead to delays or cancellations of these projects, significantly impacting both Equinor and Shell. If the court rules against the oil companies, it could harm investor sentiment and lead to a downturn in their stock prices. Furthermore, strong public opposition and regulatory scrutiny could restrict their operations, putting future profitability at risk.

For Shell, the implications of potential delays at the Jackdaw field could result in financial losses and decrease confidence in their North Sea operations. Therefore, the ruling could adversely affect Shell's stock performance in the near term as market reactions to legal uncertainties typically lead to a cautious approach from investors.

Related News

A court in the Netherlands has overturned a 2021 ruling ordering Shell to cut carbon emissions by 45% by 2030, dealing a blow to climate activist groups.

Campaigners want to stop the Rosebank oil and Jackdaw gas fields, but oil companies say they are vital.

SHEL
EQNR

A lower court had ordered the company to cut emissions by 45 percent by 2030, but the oil giant argued that a single firm should not be hit with arbitrary pollution-reduction requirements.